Virtual Exchange vs Virtual training

You might wonder how we differentiate between a virtual exchange and a virtual training? The scheme below provides an overview of the different emphases within the methodological principles of each format. 

Methodological principles

Virtual exchange
Virtual training
Designed around
process content
Learning is
implicit explicit
Learner is
leading in process central in design
Method of instruction
facilitated instructed
Interaction between learners
is the core of the learning is supportive to the learning
Emphasis on
Contemporary themes Timeless themes and skills
Interaction is
mostly synchronous synchronous & asynchronous
Connection is made to
people content
Assignments
deepen the learning process check the learning process
Learning outcomes are
flexible to each participant identical for each participant

 

A virtual exchange

A designed interactive process in which the learner is leading. Learners interact synchronously under the guidance of facilitators to engage on contemporary themes. Through the interactive process learners implicitly develop various skills. However, to which extent they develop those skills is flexible and dependent on their own needs and previous experiences. Participant’s curiosity might be triggered and stimulated, their self-esteem can be enhanced, their previously held beliefs and viewpoints may be challenged and their listening skills might improve. The assignments learners engage in are solely designed  to deepen the learning process. Submitting assignments is sufficient to pass the course as meta analysis on learning outcomes for all participants together show us that the overall learning outcomes are being met at a certain level of participation and assignments submission.

A virtual training

Is designed around specific content or skills. Learning outcomes are explicit and equal to all participants. Learners are instructed, and engage in the training through readings and video-materials and interact with peers or instructors both synchronous and asynchronous to support their comprehension of the content. Assignments are used to control for this comprehension and can be failed after submission. Trained skills and taught content are timeless and do not necessarily have a link to contemporary issues. 

Learning objectives

Typically, through virtual exchanges learners develop what is referred to in literature as soft skills, transversal skills or 21st century skills. Such skills include curiosity, self-esteem, tolerance to ambiguity, serenity, resilience, critical thinking, listening skills, or cross-cultural competences. Through virtual trainings, participants typically develop more concrete or ‘hard’ skills, like digital competences, foreign language skills or media-literacy. This also clarifies the difference in learning outcome measurement. It is at least unethical but arguably impossible, to fail a participant on a low level of self-esteem or by not being curious enough. It is possible to measure someone’s ability to use online tools, such as Google sheets or to measure a certain language proficiency or the ability to distinguish between real and fake news. The above is not exclusive, but illustrative to a typical learning outcome for each model. 

Subscribe to our newsletter. Stay up to date about our programmes and more.

I accept that SPF will store my submitted information so they can respond to my inquiry.
For more information on how we handle your data, please read our Privacy Statement.

More from our blog

From MOOC to iOOC

What once filled the speaking slots of education conferences, have now settled into spaces of predictability. Still, there are valuable lessons to be learned from their rapid rise and un-exceeded expectations of MOOCs. To name a few: Widely available won’t always mean widely used. Accessible won’t always mean accessed. Learning needs to be social and experiential, and online learning requires grounded affiliations and incentives. Is there a place for virtual exchange in open online courses? We have found that there is. 

Read more

Youth at the forefront of conflict transformation

In the 4-week Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange course on Youth, Peace, and Security, young people led and defined the conversation about themselves. "This experience broadened my thinking on peace building and conflict transformation processes. It gave me the platform to create new connections and relationships."

Read more

Coming this autumn: The Sharing Perspectives Podcast

Stories from leading experts, journalists, youth activists and other people at the forefront of key debates. Join them to explore the impact of climate change on people, planet and politics.

Read more

Bilal on gaining confidence and spreading awareness

In 2018 Bilal took part in the Virtual Exchange ‘Refuge/es in Europe’ which was offered through the Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange initiative. Fast forward to 2020, Bilal is a trained online dialogue facilitator and active community member; “I am trying to spread the impact of Virtual Exchange in my local community and through my current work”.

Read more

Codifying Values and Enabling Scale

In 2018, Sharing Perspectives Foundation started implementing activities under the Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange initiative. Alongside our consortium partners, one of the first joint actions we took was to develop a code of conduct as we established a shared community of facilitators. So, what is the code of conduct, and why are we sharing it?

Read more

‘How can we find opportunities in conflict?’

Evelyn is a 29 year old legal practitioner from Nigeria currently on track to receive a Masters degree from the International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands. Her personal and professional background motivated her to participate in the virtual exchange ‘Youth Peace and Security’ (2020) offered through the Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange initiative.

Read more